Protection (Sirius Mo Remix)
Ben Mono
Universal Unit – EP, 2004 (on iTunes)
Compost Records
Warning: this post gets a little technical but I would love to hear some feedback.
I was pretty staunchly against buying music from iTunes for a long time. The music was too controlled, the “digital rights management” (copy protection) not only meant it was a pain to move the music around, it also didn’t work with serato (the program I dj with). On top of that the quality was way too low. In iTunes, you can transfer music from CD at qualities that range from 16 kb per second to 320 kb per second. 16 to 96 sound like varying degrees of listening to the song on a broken speaker in an elevator. The folks at iTunes picked the quality level that just gets out of the broken speaker arena (128 kb per second) but would still sound awful if played through large speakers at a concert.
Recently, Apple and the major labels reached an agreement which allows Apple to remove the copy protection from all songs it sells on the iTunes store (and also upgrades the quality of those songs to 256 kbps). The songs also work with Serato now. It definitely makes it harder to rail against them.
I say all that to say that, I bought this song on iTunes after I got hooked on it when my friend Geraldine from the Bay sent me a lower quality version. I’m a little trepidatious about posting it because my name is embedded in the file as the purchaser (and therefore the sharer) but the tide seems to be moving in the direction of less (or no) random prosecution of individuals and some sort of attempt at giving people music when and where they want it in an attempt to rebuild some kind of consumer loyalty, so I think I’m in the clear.
Still, I have to ask, where is this fast moving negotiation of policy and quality going to end up? Download speeds are only getting faster and hard drives are only getting cheaper. This paragraph from the Times article is emblematic of the entire digital music quandry as far as I’m concerned:
Apple said customers would be able to pay a one-time fee to strip copying restrictions from music they have already bought on iTunes, at 30 cents a song or 30 percent of the album price. ITunes customers can achieve the same effect by burning all of their music to a CD and then reimporting the music into the iTunes software, although this reduces sound quality somewhat.
Hmmm, so let me get this straight, I can re-buy the mp3s I already bought (in some cases, to replace my CDs which were replacements for my…cassettes…records) at a discount and then in 3 years you’re going to announce that you are selling 512 kbps mp3s (or the “lossless” format of the day)? Can I pay again then? How about when you announce full CD-quality 16-bit AIFF files in 2015? Those must go for a premium! And my mouth is just watering to pay again for the 24-bit and 32-bit remastered recordings of 2020!
And through it all, I can’t help but feel that we are guaranteeing the eventual extinction of recordings that don’t get widespread distribution. The opposite argument could easily be made – the chances of obtaining the song are better if it’s on 10 computers than if there are 10 hard copies strewn around the world but what’s missing in that argument is that someone has to be looking for that song/album/artist by name. If no one knows the name after 10 years then no one will be looking. No one will “come across” that recording in 40 years and be surprised at how good it is.
Any thoughts?
By the way, the vocals on this song are by Bajka, the same woman who performed on this song that I posted in September ’06. She and Ben Mono are both based in Munich.
Songs are available for two weeks.





March 5th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
Well Jon
I think its like this
Music and Art they really serve no purpose in there pure form.There is nothing we are supposed to do with them.Listen Look become a part of etc.So beyond those natural things you can not really put a price on them.It would be like putting a price on breathing.However the music business has always been selling us on quality and some new format from the cylinder up to today.I do think you make a good point on something I never thought about which is “Rare Mp3s” I think that would make a very interesting list.The thing I do not like about mp3s is storage and hard drives.I do not dj in places nearly as much as I used to and if I did I am sure I would be mp3 friendly but right now I have a hard time trying to organize my records let alone mp3s.I think that there is such variety these days with all the revivals of the past music and past devices plus new music that everyone has a hard time keeping up.I think that is also an example of music and arts repetitions revolutions per minute in this era its per second.So are we to keep up with it as it happens or as we can?
I do not think half of us could listen to all the records mp3s or music we have in one lifetime so where does that leave us ?
March 6th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
labels are definitely always on the upsell, that was part of the point i was trying to make but i guess one thing i didn’t think about until i read your comment is that, once we move up the digital food chain to completely uncompressed files, could they possibly run out formats to sell us? if so, that could be bigger news than the endless upselling (that is, if major labels are still in business at that point).
March 7th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
run out of formats? that didn’t stop the industry from moving from VHS to DVD to Blu-Ray…
on the flipside of your post, i am actually happy to see a reverse in what has been a very long progression of declining quality. from pure waveforms on vinyl, to lower fidelity analog on cassettes to compressed audio on CDs to very poor quality mp3s. if the bottom of the quality ladder was at 192 kbs, then i am quite glad to see it rise again.
as for the economics… it was economic pressure and competition that forced DRM to give way, so lets hope that trend continues as well. what we really need is someone to release a newer mp3 version that allows us to go above 320kbs. give me the option to reach 1411 kbs…
March 10th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
i think the vhs-to-dvd is comparable to cassettes-to-cds. the paths diverged after that but i think both are headed to high quality downloads. where else could they go after that? people aren’t going to want to go back to the “inconvenience” of physical products and the quality can only go so high.
you make a good point about the quality flow reversing. i didn’t really think about that.
we don’t really need another mp3 version if someone can create a functional metadata standard for aiffs or wav’s (unless there is one i don’t know about…probably not).
March 13th, 2009 at 3:38 am
I’ve been hearing a lot about FLAC lately. Free Lossless Audio Codec. It seems to be the best way to compress audio, although I’m sure iTunes etc etc won’t ever touch it. Didn’t Beta have better picture quality than VHS? Dunno if that’s true or just an urban myth, but I think that’s how it’s going to go with FLAC. Anyways…
April 6th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
not commenting on the tech side……but this song is doooope!. Got it here a while ago, but didn’t listen. Thanks!
April 14th, 2009 at 3:11 pm
thanks! glad you like it.